September 5, 2008

What Does Caveat Emptor Mean?

Hugo Black is often described as a

Image via Wikipedia

I want to bring to your attention an interesting paper by Robert Rabe about the origins of the FTC's jurisdiction over advertising. 

The paper starts out with an insightful quote:


There is no duty resting upon a citizen to suspect the honesty of those with whom he transacts business. 

Laws are made to protect  the trusting as well as the suspicious.

The rule of caveat emptor should not be relied upon to reward fraud and deception.

Justice Hugo Black

Think about that for a bit: there is no duty resting upon a citizen to "suspect the honesty" of those he or she is transacting business with.

Yet, the if citizen misunderstands, fails to inquire, or doesn't look too deeply into the terms of a deceitful franchise agreement, the law will proclaim "caveat emptor" or buy beware.

Robert Rabe traces the history of Federal control over advertising, and starts with observing that

"The period between 1900 and the mid-1930s stands out as a profoundly important era in the development of American advertising. 

During this time, the nascent industry adopted innovative persuasive techniques based on new methods of applied psychology, contributed to its first war effort, formed its first professional organizations, and helped launch the modern consumer society. 

One characteristic of advertising during these years was the movement to establish the trade as a profession and a reputable participant in economic and social life. 

In doing so, the advertising industry staked its claim as a vital component to the economic health of the nation."

Doesn't sound like a century has made too much a difference, does it.

Read the entire paper, especially in light of the FTC's decision to hold meetings regarding its authority over misleading advertising.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Where Are the Gurus?

Graphic representation of a minute fraction of...

Image via Wikipedia

Like you, I am a fan of Jeremy Shoemaker, Brian Clark, and Darren Rowse, read their RSS feeds and generally enjoy their observatons.

Shoe gossips, Clark provides insight, and Rowse is consistently steady with practical advice.

So, I wonder what the following graph means?

Are they losing their collective audiences, is the market for attention not growing, or is it a meaningless picture?

shoe copy pro.jpg

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Disagreement is Disrespect

Old book bindings at the Merton College library.

Image via Wikipedia

Robin Hanson's posts at Overcoming Bias often intrigue me.  He appears to be engaging, perhaps deliberately, in what the philosopher Grice called flouting conversational implicatures

Just read this.


"When you knowingly disagree with someone you are judging them to be less rational than you, at least on that topic. 

(Judging them less informed or experienced by itself can't create disagreement.) 

It might be only a minor disrespect, if you think this disagreement suggests little about whether you'd disagree with them elsewhere. 

But disagreement is disrespect, nonetheless."

Now, I don't know about you, but this is a pretty hard conclusion to either agree with or disagree with.

If you merely said "I disagree", you might be implying "You jerk, Hanson - and no, I haven't stopped beating my wife."

Personally, I disagree with this conclusion, but love the idea that it expresses.

I love the idea for what it shows: statements make truth claims, but aslo express other sentiments that are not irrelevant to the truth claim.

This is a fancy, but not merely fancy, way of saying that it matters what you say, and how you say it.

In conclusion, I disagree with Hanson, but I am very amused by his conclusion. Have I disrespected Hanson by disagreeing and also being amused?

I suspect not, otherwise why take the time to reply? 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to Create A Better Stop Sign

From Dan Ariely's Predictably Irrational,

The Corporation does Coordination


http://view.break.com/542649 - Watch more free videos

Buy Dan's Book, Predictably Irrational.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 115 Next

Ratings

ABA Advertising Law Blogs

Law Blogs - Blog Top Sites Featured in Alltop

Recommended Reading

Ads

Ads

Get Free Updates

Privacy Policy

Subscribe with email or RSS

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Comments

michael webster on Are Ads are the New Online Tip Jar?: If you read our policy on adse

alrady40 on Are Ads are the New Online Tip Jar?: LOL this is really good. YOu

Scam Alert on Is XL Results Foundation a Scam?: Snake Oil Salesman, Roger Hami

michael webster on New Cult Products From USANA: How does the fact that this wa

Steven on New Cult Products From USANA: FYI, you are putting a slant o

michael webster on Are Ads are the New Online Tip Jar?: But, he doesn't have any ads o

trea on Are Ads are the New Online Tip Jar?: this is just another slick mar

michael webster on Wextrust Ponzi Expands: I will be following this story