Main

June 21, 2007

How to Avoid ATM Distributorship Fraud

ATM Scrip machines are similar to ordinary ATM's, but instead of dispensing cash they dispense scrip or dollars that can only be used in the merchant's particular location. For Canadians, this would be like an ATM machine which only dispensed Canadian Tire dollars. I can imagine that one use for such machines for a large retail environment which wished to sell its own coupons at a discounted rate, for example.

But what is terrific about their website is this copyscaped page on why most business opportunities fail. It is great, not just because ATM Scrip is agrees with what I have written about due diligence and location services, but the article puts the correct emphasis on selling. If you cannot sell a merchant on locating one of these machines, you should not be in the business. There is, outside of investing a public company, no such thing as passive investment in the ATM distributorship business. Nobody who can sell, needs to borrow money from you at 20 or 25%. This is hard for most people to understand, as they only focus on their supposed return from investing in a ATM distributorship. But think about it from the sellers point of view: he claims to have locations, but needs money to purchase the ATM's. He will pay you 20 to 25% on your investment, or loan to him. The obvious flaw here is that he should be able to obtain credit from a bank at significantly lower than 20 or 25 points, if there is a real business. But he cannot because there is no real business.

June 21, 2006

One Source ATM News

Here is a quick look at the news stories involving OneSource ATM, as of June 21, 2006.

Technorati Tags: news stories, onesource atm

June 14, 2006

OneSource Financial - An Analysis of their Biz Op Disclosure

OneSource Financial presents in a interesting picture as we can compare their FTC Disclosure document to what various state corporate documents show about the company. Remember that the FTC or State Disclosure document is not checked for its accuracy by any government official. It is up to you to conduct the background check using the document and other sources of information.

What are the warning signs with this document?

  1. Item 16 is supposed to tell you the number of biz ops sold, repurchased, and/or cancelled. This is to give you an idea about the chances of success of the biz op. This Item 16, while technically correct as of January 2005, says nothing about how many biz ops have been sold. The disclosure is completely deficient.
  2. Item 2 is supposed to provide details on the owners of the biz op seller. None of the details about corporate management match up with corporate filings from the California and Nevada.
  3. Item 14 is completely contrary to the representations made to the investors in Colorado.
  4. Finally, the financial documents are deficient because there is no income statement, which you tell you if the seller was making more money from selling biz ops than from selling ATMs.

Technorati Tags: biz ops, biz op, state disclosure, disclosure document, ftc, warning signs, background check, onesource, corporate documents, documents show, government official, contrary, nevada

Navigation

Law Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Google Ads

How to Subscribe

Privacy Policy

Subscribing allows you to be updated with either email or RSS, automatically and without having to return to the site. You will never have concerns about privacy or spam.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

feed.jpg

Recommendations

These are ads for tools or programs, which I either use daily or are deserving public ads.

Even though I would recommend these tools or programs, I may receive compensation for doing so.

No compensation is received for the public ads.

Mediators Without Borders