One allure of the Ponzi Scheme
Virtually every news story on ponzi schemes fail to explain why the schemes are so attractive- greed is the only explanation.
But greed is not a complete answer. There is at least one more complete explanation: our naive induction schemes are bad, incorrectly generalizing from a past series of events.
Here is a little test to take. If I said that I could manage $100.00 for you and give you a 10% return on your money, how months of getting this return would you need to believe me? Call that number "N".
Now, suppose I said that I didn't even need the $100.00, I would give you your 10% return, if you would contract with me to pay the $100.00 after N months? Is this a better or more sure idea?
The answer is no. For most people N is 3 or 4 months. But the correct answer has to be at least 16 months.
I can perform the 10% miracle by simply returning $10 of your capital to you each month. After 3 or 4 months, my fund goes "bankrupt" and I walk away with your $60.00 and large laments about our "collective" misfortune.
Naive induction, combined with regret, and social proof -everyone who is anyone is invested- are powerful enough to overwhelm many skeptics.
